Menú Principal

Twitter.

Iniciado por Neo, Septiembre 18, 2009, 08:38:51 AM

Tema anterior - Siguiente tema

poshol na

Cita de: javi en Marzo 13, 2023, 03:14:57 PM¿También colaboraba en esa cadena? ¿De dónde saca la gente tanto tiempo?
Tampoco es que Toni Cantó tenga una agenda apretadísima.

defedef232

Cita de: poshol na en Marzo 14, 2023, 08:07:21 AM
Cita de: javi en Marzo 13, 2023, 03:14:57 PM¿También colaboraba en esa cadena? ¿De dónde saca la gente tanto tiempo?
Tampoco es que Toni Cantó tenga una agenda apretadísima.
Siempre en mi equipo... la (síntesis post) siesta es mejor "analytics" que el big data de programación lineal, ya os lo digo yo

Now let us suppose that the investigators manipulate their design, analyses, and reporting so as to make more relationships cross the p = 0.05 threshold even though this would not have been crossed with a perfectly adhered to design and analysis (and with perfect comprehensive reporting of the results, strictly according to the original study plan) by serendipitous inclusion or exclusion of certain inputs/media controls, post hoc subgroup analyses, investigation of genetic contrasts that were not originally specified, changes in the pre & postcontrol definitions, and various combinations of selective or distorted reporting of the results.

Corollary 1: The smaller the studies conducted in a scientific field, the less likely the research findings are to be true... de clavo, sin comentarios

Corollary 2: The smaller the effect sizes in a scientific field, the less likely the research findings are to be true. Consequently, the proportion of true research findings is expected to decrease. In the same line of thinking, if the true effect sizes are very small in a scientific field, this field is likely to be plagued by almost ubiquitous false positive claims... <- quieres tener razón?, especialziate en algo que le coma la polla a todos, no te hagas entrenador de la selección nacional, real o vocacional con cubata en la mano

Corollary 3: The greater the number and the lesser the selective definitions. Fields considered highly informative, economics or political trends, the assembled and tested information, such as microarrays and other high-throughput discovery-oriented research, should have extremely low verification probability... todas putas <- a partir de 50 para abajo, siempre puedes argumentar algo a favor

Corollary 4: The greater the flexibility in designs, definitions, outcomes, and analytical modes in a scientific field, the less likely the research findings are to be true. Flexibility increases the potential for transforming what would be "negative" results into "positive" results, i.e., bias, u. For several research designs, e.g., randomized controlled trials [facebook] or meta-analyses [twiter-influencers], there have been efforts to standardize their conduct and reporting. Adherence to common standards is likely to increase the proportion of true findings. The same applies to outcomes. True findings may be more common when outcomes are unequivocal and universally agreed (e.g., penal death) rather than when multifarious outcomes are devised (e.g., election outcomes). Similarly, fields that use commonly agreed, stereotyped analytical methods (e.g., Kaplan-Meier plots and the log-rank test) may yield a larger proportion of true findings than fields where analytical methods are still under experimentation (e.g., artificial intelligence methods) and only "best" results are reported. Regardless, even in the most stringent research designs, bias seems to be a major problem. For example, there is strong evidence that selective outcome reporting, with manipulation of the outcomes and analyses reported, is a common problem even for randomized trails. Simply abolishing selective publication would not make this problem go away. ...<-maths y armas las carga el diablo

Corollary 5: The greater the financial and other interests and prejudices in a scientific field, the less likely the research findings are to be true. Conflicts of interest and prejudice may increase bias, u. Conflicts of interest are very common in scientific research. <- de puto cajón

Corollary 6: The hotter/ssy a scientific field (with more scientific teams involved), the less likely the research findings are to be true. This seemingly paradoxical corollary follows because, as stated above, the PPV of isolated findings decreases when many teams of investigators are involved in the same field. This may explain why we occasionally see major excitement followed rapidly by severe disappointments in fields that draw wide attention. With many teams working on the same field and with massive experimental data being produced, timing is of the essence in beating competition. Thus, each team may prioritize on pursuing and disseminating its most impressive "positive" results. "Negative" results may become attractive for dissemination only if some other team has found a "positive" association on the same question. In that case, it may be attractive to refute a claim made in some prestigious journal. The term Proteus phenomenon has been coined to describe this phenomenon of rapidly alternating extreme research claims and extremely opposite refutations. Empirical evidence suggests that this sequence of extreme opposites is very common in popular mechanics!. <- grandes mentiras hablando de misiles jopersçónicos o coches eléctricos, pocas o ninguma mentiras en foros de tractorias hablando de lo suyo -> forocoches
Quitame la mierda, haz favor (con esos ojillos tan bonitos que a Pavel Ahla` le'jha daado)

JM

In God we trust (sometimes, some pictures: http://www.areopago.eu/index.php?topic=888.msg574445#msg574445 )... (C) Extineo

Afirmacionista

Sancta Lejia, ora pro nobis.

ushap

Tengo que reconocer que, esta vez, al CM de Vox le ha quedado un tuit graciosete  ;D

https://twitter.com/LagrimasProgres/status/1635566842767978497

Son of a beach

Cita de: JM en Marzo 14, 2023, 05:19:00 PMhttps://twitter.com/Raspatuit/status/1634087599739396097

Si no hay rehen, no hay secuestro: Ése ha pasado con nota el curso de adiestramientos especiales.
los niggas de guetto son bastante parecidos a los gitanos, que ninguno es comunista porque en la bandera salen herramientas.

javi

Running is life. Anything before or after is just waiting

k98k

Si se llamara Juan Francisco no hubiera perdido nada.

defedef232

Extra-madura--- que no es que sea una tierra extrema, que es que está pasada de madura... que se joda, a tomar por culo los ipadas
Quitame la mierda, haz favor (con esos ojillos tan bonitos que a Pavel Ahla` le'jha daado)

defedef232

#1809
mi primera hostia con la IA de tuiter:
1. pornosawa, que es medio areopagita, esta escribiendo poemas automàticos con GTP-4 tipo Mecano le canta a Fraga Iribarne
2. el resultado me conmueve (diarrhea y arcades es pico) y le escribo: pornosawa, mátame camiòn
3. la IA me pone en cuarentena (en principio 12 horas) por favorecer o hacer apologìa del suicidio o la automutilación)
4. yo me cago encima de un encina



...a partir de ahora lo sustituirè por un adorable ¡¡¡RÙFAME CAMIÒN!!!
Quitame la mierda, haz favor (con esos ojillos tan bonitos que a Pavel Ahla` le'jha daado)

defedef232

We've temporarily limited some of your account features

felicísimo armo de casa @defedef32

What happened?

We have determined that you have violated the Twitter Rules, so we've temporarily limited some of your account features. While in this state, you can still browse Twitter, but you're limited to only sending Direct Messages to your followers — no Tweets, Retweets, Fleets, follows, or likes. Your account will be restored to full functionality in:

11 hours and 53 minutes.
Quitame la mierda, haz favor (con esos ojillos tan bonitos que a Pavel Ahla` le'jha daado)

k98k

Si es que vas como loco

k98k


defedef232

Cita de: k98k en Marzo 22, 2023, 10:56:50 PMSi es que vas como loco
Pues ha estado fina, porque iba a escibir a cuenta del NSM submarino el post del siglo...
Quitame la mierda, haz favor (con esos ojillos tan bonitos que a Pavel Ahla` le'jha daado)

Baku

Os creéis que todo el monte es Areópago y, claro, luego os pasa lo que os pasa.
It's very difficult todo esto.